Gandhinagar, Gujarat ISO 9001:2015 GST 24ADYFS2011E1Z7
Worked Projects

The numbers, and how we got them.

Four project profiles across the sectors we supply — what was there before, what we specified, and the energy arithmetic in full so you can check it against your own site.

  • 4 SectorsRoads, industry, sport, logistics
  • Assumptions shownEvery figure is reproducible

These are representative project profiles built from our standard fixtures. Savings are calculated from the wattages, running hours and tariff shown in each table, not from audited client meter readings. Your figures will differ with tariff, burning hours and the condition of what you are replacing.

Municipal & Rural Roads

Gram panchayat approach road: 250W sodium to 100W LED street light

Gandhinagar district, Gujarat

A 2 km panchayat approach road on 9 m poles, running 250W high pressure sodium fittings that were failing every monsoon. Replaced with 100W LED street lights on the existing poles.

64% less lighting energy
  • Before 70,664 kWh/yr
  • After 25,696 kWh/yr
  • Saved 44,968 kWh/yr
  • At ₹8/kWh ₹359,744/yr

The problem on site

Sodium vapour fittings were being replaced two or three at a time after every monsoon, mostly driver and ignitor failures from water ingress and unstable rural supply. The panchayat was paying for both the electricity and a recurring replacement bill, and stretches of the road sat dark for weeks between repairs.

What we specified

  • Specified 100W rather than a like-for-like 250W: at 130 lm/W the LED head delivers comparable road surface lux to a 250W sodium lamp that has already depreciated
  • Asymmetric optics so the distribution reaches 30 m spacing without raising wattage
  • IP66 sealing and inbuilt surge protection, which is what the sodium fittings lacked
  • Retained the existing poles and brackets, so the work was a fitting swap rather than a civil job

Outcome

Roughly 45,000 kWh a year off the panchayat bill on these figures. At the fixture cost alone the spend is recovered inside a lighting season; the larger gain is that a sealed, surge-protected head is not being replaced three times a year.

Industrial & Warehousing

Warehouse high bay retrofit: 400W metal halide to 300W LED

Industrial estate, Gujarat

A storage and despatch shed on 8 m mounting, lit by 400W metal halide bays with long restrike times and visibly uneven aisles. Replaced with 300W LED bays on the existing hook points.

34% less lighting energy
  • Before 65,992 kWh/yr
  • After 43,800 kWh/yr
  • Saved 22,192 kWh/yr
  • At ₹8/kWh ₹177,536/yr

The problem on site

Metal halide lamps had depreciated well below their rated output, leaving dark bands between aisles where picking errors were happening. Restrike after any supply dip meant ten to fifteen minutes of a half-lit shed, and lamp replacement needed a scissor lift each time.

What we specified

  • Surveyed actual lux at floor level rather than trusting the original design, which is usually where the real shortfall shows
  • Specified 300W LED bays at the same hook positions to avoid re-rigging the shed
  • Instant restrike, so a supply dip no longer costs a quarter hour of production
  • Batch burn-tested before dispatch, because access for a warranty swap needs a lift

Outcome

A 34% cut in lighting energy, which is the honest figure for a metal halide swap - smaller than the sodium numbers quoted elsewhere in this industry. The measurable gain here is uniformity across the aisles and the end of restrike delays.

Sports & Recreation

Box cricket turf: 400W halogen to 150W LED flood light with lens

Ahmedabad, Gujarat

A rooftop box cricket turf running halogen floods that glared into neighbouring flats and cost more to run than the bookings covered. Replaced with 150W lensed LED floods aimed at the playing surface.

63% less lighting energy
  • Before 5,840 kWh/yr
  • After 2,190 kWh/yr
  • Saved 3,650 kWh/yr
  • At ₹8/kWh ₹29,200/yr

The problem on site

Halogen floods threw as much light at the surrounding buildings as at the turf. The operator had already had complaints about glare into flats, and the electricity cost was eating into what the evening slots earned.

What we specified

  • Lensed optics rather than an open flood, so the beam lands on the turf instead of the boundary net and the windows behind it
  • Eight fittings on the four corner poles for coverage without hot spots under the poles
  • Aimed below the horizontal, which is what actually stops the complaints
  • Sized at 150W because the playing area is small; a larger fitting would have over-lit it and worsened the glare

Outcome

Running cost down roughly 63%, and the glare complaints stop because the light is on the turf rather than the neighbours. For a venue billing by the hour, the lighting stops being a fixed drag on the margin.

Logistics & Open Yards

Truck yard high mast: 1000W halogen to 400W LED mast head

Gujarat

A loading and parking yard lit by 1000W halogen floods on a 20 m mast, with heavy shadowing between vehicles. Replaced with 400W LED mast heads on the existing ring.

60% less lighting energy
  • Before 35,040 kWh/yr
  • After 14,016 kWh/yr
  • Saved 21,024 kWh/yr
  • At ₹8/kWh ₹168,192/yr

The problem on site

Halogen heads drew heavily, ran hot and needed the ring lowered for every lamp change. Parked trailers cast long shadows, and the yard relied on vehicle headlights to work between them at night.

What we specified

  • Eight 400W LED heads on the existing ring, so no mast or foundation work was needed
  • Distribution chosen for the yard shape rather than a symmetric flood, which is what causes the shadowing between parked vehicles
  • Die-cast housings with surge protection, because a mast head is the most expensive fitting on any site to reach twice
  • Warranty handled from our plant, not routed through a brand office

Outcome

About 21,000 kWh a year saved on these hours, with the bigger operational win being that the ring no longer has to come down for lamp changes on a yard that works through the night.

Your Site

Want this arithmetic run on your own numbers?

Send the wattage you run now, the fitting count and your burning hours. We will come back with a fixture recommendation and the same table for your site — usually within one working day.